Health Bulletin 05/ August/ 2024

Here are the top health stories for the day:
Powered by WPeMatico
Here are the top health stories for the day:
Powered by WPeMatico
Powered by WPeMatico
Powered by WPeMatico
Powered by WPeMatico
Powered by WPeMatico
Powered by WPeMatico
Thane: A Navi Mumbai-based doctor couple has been booked for allegedly cheating a medical shop owner of Rs 1.27 crore after they offered him a pharmacy space at their establishment back in 2013.
Police said that based on a complaint, a case under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code was registered at the NRI police station on Saturday against Dr Dhaval Khanayalal Derashri and his wife, Dr Lata Derashri, and one Khanayalal Derashri.
According to a PTI report, the complainant has alleged that the accused, who owned a hospital in the Seawoods area of Navi Mumbai, offered him a pharmacy at their establishment in 2013 and took Rs 49 lakh from him, he said.
Also Read:Telangana doctor duped of Rs 33 lakh in magical money doubling scheme
The couple also purchased medicines worth Rs 48 lakh and never paid him, and they allegedly borrowed Rs 30 lakh and failed to return the sum, the official said.
The matter is being investigated and no arrests have been made so far, he added.
Powered by WPeMatico
Bhopal: In a recent development,
Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) has criticized the Madhya Pradesh government’s decision to privatize 10 district hospitals. In a letter addressed to Chief Minister
Mohan Yadav, the NGO has urged the government to withdraw the notification and deny the private entities power to manage these hospitals.
The organization has
called for a boycott of private intervention in the health sector. The government’s
move aligns with the Niti Aayog’s proposal and affects districts such as
Katni, Morena, Panna, Balaghat, Bhind, Dhar, Khargone, Sidhi, Tikamgarh, and
Betul. JSA’s letter highlights the importance of strengthening the public
health system rather than transferring control to private entities, reports the Times of India. The NGO’s opposition is rooted in the history of unsuccessful
attempts by the state government to privatize government-run hospitals.
In a joint statement by NGO
representatives, Amulya Nidhi, SR Azad, Dhirendra Arya, and Sudha Tiwari said, “Today,
the need is to strengthen the public health system and ensure health services
for all without discrimination and not to hand over public health institutions
to private hands.”
In 2016, the state’s
decision to subcontract health services at the Alirajpur District Hospital and the
Community Health Centre in Jobat encountered significant challenges. Similarly,
an initiative involving Indore’s MY Hospital in 2012 faced resistance from both
doctors and the public, leading to its eventual abandonment, reports the Daily.
“That too was
unsuccessful and due to opposition from doctors and the public, the govt had to
withdraw this decision,” said Nidhi. JSA member Amulya Nidhi
has also pointed to the Karnataka government’s Arogya Bandhu scheme, which
involved private participation but was ultimately deemed unsuccessful by the
government’s own evaluation. The NGO’s stance underscores the need for a robust
public health system and cautions against relying on privatization as a
solution to healthcare challenges.
Jan Swasthya Sahayata
Abhiyan has been formed by the Healthcare Research and Development Board
(Division of Social Welfare Organization “NAC”) to provide affordable, free and better treatment with health-related assistance to poor and needy people.
The purpose of the organization is to provide better treatment by special
doctors, medicines and medical tests to the poor and needy people of the
country through Jan Swasthya Sahayata Abhiyan, also motivating people to follow
the guidelines given by the government to stay safe from COVID-19 by organizing
awareness programs and providing health-related support as well as providing
yoga and exercise training.
Powered by WPeMatico
Germany: The PASSION trial, which was halted early due to issues with the study medication supply, does not endorse tadalafil use for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension. The trial raised potential safety concerns and found no benefits in achieving the primary or secondary endpoints.
While the results did not reveal a significant difference in the risk of the primary endpoint between the tadalafil and placebo groups, there was a potential indication of a higher risk of all-cause mortality in the tadalafil group, the researchers wrote in Circulation.
Marius M. Hoeper, Hannover Medical School, Germany, and colleagues aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension.
In the double-blind PASSION study (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Combined Post- and Pre-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension), patients with HFpEF and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tadalafil at a target dose of 40 mg or a placebo.
The primary endpoint was the time to the first composite event, which included adjudicated heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints assessed included all-cause mortality and improvements in the New York Heart Association functional class or a ≥10% improvement in the 6-minute walking distance from baseline.
The study revealed the following findings:
“This study does not support the use of tadalafil for patients with HFpEF and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension, highlighting potential safety concerns,” the researchers concluded.
Reference:
Hoeper MM, Oerke B, Wissmüller M, Leuchte H, Opitz C, Halank M, Seyfarth HJ, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Böhm M, Ghofrani HA, Konstantinides S, Olsson KM, Wachter R, Lam CSP, Aminossadati B, Rosenkranz S. Tadalafil for Treatment of Combined Postcapillary and Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study. Circulation. 2024 Jun 28. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069340. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38939948.
Powered by WPeMatico
Norway: A comprehensive six-year follow-up of participants from two major clinical trials investigating rituximab and cyclophosphamide for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) has yielded significant insights into the long-term efficacy and safety of these treatments. The follow-up aims to provide a clearer understanding of the sustained effects and potential benefits of these drugs in managing a condition often marked by debilitating fatigue and other challenging symptoms.
Six-year follow-up data indicate that patients with ME or CFS who received cyclophosphamide experienced more significant and enduring improvements than those treated with rituximab or a placebo.
After six years, 44.1% of patients in the cyclophosphamide group achieved an SF-36 Physical Function (PF) score of 70 or higher, with 17.6% reaching a score of 90 or above,” the researchers reported in PLoS ONE. The findings suggest that cyclophosphamide may positively influence the disease course for some individuals. However, due to its potential toxicity, cyclophosphamide should be used cautiously and only within the context of clinical trials for ME/CFS patients, they warned.
Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets B-cells, and cyclophosphamide, a chemotherapy agent with immunosuppressive properties, were chosen in the study due to their potential to address underlying immune system dysfunction believed to contribute to ME/CFS. Ingrid G. Rekeland, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, and colleagues used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to compare values at baseline, at 18 months, and six-year follow-up from the RituxME and CycloME trials.
The researchers performed two clinical trials between 2014 and 2017 based on the hypothesis that ME/CFS in a subgroup of patients is a variant of an autoimmune disease.
The RituxME trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study involving 151 patients, evaluating the effects of the B-cell-depleting antibody rituximab. In contrast, the CycloME trial was an open-label phase II study with 40 participants, assessing the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide. The present report presents the six-year follow-up results from both trials, utilizing the Short Form 36 Physical Function (SF-36 PF) and the DePaul Short Form (DSQ-SF) questionnaires.
The researchers reported the following findings:
The researchers advised physicians and patients not to use cyclophosphamide for ME/CFS patients outside of clinical trials before further research is available.
“The data should drive increased efforts to deepen our understanding of disease mechanisms and to explore targeted, less toxic immune-modulatory treatments for this patient population,” they concluded.
Reference:
Rekeland, I. G., Sørland, K., Neteland, L. L., Fosså, A., Alme, K., Risa, K., Dahl, O., Tronstad, K. J., Mella, O., & Fluge, Ø. (2024). Six-year follow-up of participants in two clinical trials of rituximab or cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0307484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307484
Powered by WPeMatico